Editorial Policy
How we research, write, review, and maintain our content.
Research Standards
Every article begins with authoritative culinary reference sources — Harold McGee's On Food and Cooking, Susheela Raghavan's Handbook of Spices, Seasonings, and Flavorings, and peer-reviewed food science journals. We cross-reference at least 3 sources for factual claims.
Health-related content is sourced from NIH NCCIH, PubMed, and established medical references. We never use LLM-generated health data without verification against peer-reviewed sources.
Review Process
All articles go through a two-stage review: first by a culinary researcher for accuracy and completeness, then by a food professional (chef, food scientist, or certified herbalist) for practical relevance. Both reviewers are credited in the article's review badge.
Substitution Testing
Spice substitution ratios are kitchen-tested in at least two dish types before publishing. We document what each substitute preserves (flavor, color, aroma) and what it loses. Untested ratios are clearly labeled as estimates.
Health Claims Policy
We use hedging language for all health claims: "research suggests," "studies indicate," "traditional use includes." We never claim a spice "cures" or "treats" any condition. Every health claim is accompanied by a citation. We note when evidence is preliminary or based on supplement-dose studies rather than dietary amounts.
Corrections & Updates
Every article has a public correction log. When readers or reviewers identify errors, we fix them within 48 hours and note the change. Articles are reviewed quarterly and updated when new evidence warrants changes. The "Updated" date in the review badge always reflects the most recent substantive edit.
Independence
KnowTheSpice is independently operated. Our editorial content is never influenced by advertisers or affiliate partners. Product recommendations in buying guides are based on quality testing and expert assessment, not compensation. Affiliate links are clearly disclosed when present.